“Sobriety checkpoints or roadblocks involve law enforcement officials stopping every vehicle (or more typically, every nth vehicle) on a public roadway and investigating the possibility that the driver might be too impaired to drive. They are often set up late at night or in the very early morning hours and on weekends, at which time the proportion of impaired drivers tends to be the highest. Checkpoints are also often set near the exit points of public events, to prevent large numbers of drunk drivers from being released into traffic simultaneously from the event.”
I've been in Portland since 1996. In that time I thought I might see sobriety checkpoints become law here. It hasn’t happened yet, and the main reason I found out was because nearly 25 years ago, the Oregon State Supreme Court ruled it was unconstitutional for police to set up sobriety checkpoints to spot drunken drivers. I’ve read the pros and cons on the topic. Some say it's a waste of money; others say it has been successful. Obviously, you shouldn’t drink and drive at all, but as humans we are faulty.
If you have an opinion on the topic we’d love to hear from you.
References worth reading:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Random_checkpoint
http://www.oregonlive.com/opinion/index.ssf/2011/02/sobriety_checkpoint_ahead_lets.html
http://www.oregonlive.com/politics/index.ssf/2011/02/pros_cons_get_an_airing_on_ame.html
No comments:
Post a Comment